[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17214880#comment-17214880
]
Andrew Kyle Purtell commented on HBASE-25183:
---------------------------------------------
I am supportive of the high level idea of factoring the balancer to be more
maintainable. Maybe that would be facilitated by moving it into its own Maven
module, maybe not, remains to be seen in the details. My concerns are mostly
about how much of server/master internals have to be carried along with the
balancer implementation into the other module. Related, say we want to add a
new cost function that needs some master internal state to make a decision,
must we hack both the balancer and server modules to add it or not.
bq. I do not think this is 'a JIRA with no description'.
This is an issue with no description as of the time of this comment. JIRA says
_Click to add description_
As with anything there is no hard rule here. Simple work doesn't need a
description. On the other hand this is a significant refactor of a major piece
of functionality and I would expect a reasonable description outlining the
motivation, goals, and success criteria for the work, ideally a full design
document. It is the minimum one should expect for collaboration. Because we
don't make hard rules here strictly speaking some words about the design and
goals are not required, only a patch is required, but your risk of a technical
veto due to misunderstanding or lack of alignment is much higher if you don't
explain your work first.
> Move more balancer related classes to hbase-balancer
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-25183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25183
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Umbrella
> Components: Balancer
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
