[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17414139#comment-17414139
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8638:
---------------------------------------
Huh, I got unsubscribed from this somehow and missed all the fun. Thanks
[~sokolov] for pushing this over the finish line!
I have one query, concerning the `haversin()` function in expressions. I don't
think we should change value of this function, CHANGES entry or no - it's too
easy for it to be part of a more complicated script that will just stop working
in very confusing ways on upgrade. I think instead we can delegate to the
non-deprecated method and then just multiple by 1000 to keep the existing
contract - does this make sense?
> Remove deprecated code in main
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8638
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8638
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Alan Woodward
> Assignee: Alan Woodward
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: main (9.0)
>
> Time Spent: 4.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There are a number of deprecations in master that should be removed. This
> issue is to keep track of deprecations as a whole, some individual
> deprecations may require their own issues.
>
> Work on this issue should be pushed to the `master-deprecations` branch on
> gitbox
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
