joewitt commented on code in PR #8892:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8892#discussion_r1619049108
##########
nifi-assembly/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -350,6 +350,42 @@ language governing permissions and limitations under the
License. -->
<version>2.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<type>nar</type>
</dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>org.apache.nifi</groupId>
+ <artifactId>nifi-generic-db-adapter-provider-nar</artifactId>
+ <version>2.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
+ <type>nar</type>
Review Comment:
Can you share more about the benefit of each of these being their own nar?
If i understand each nar correctly it does not contain provider specific things
like mssql/etc.. So it seems like they can all be together. If something had
bespoke requirements splitting them is good.
Can you share more on what you had in mind?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
