Github user apiri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/118#discussion_r176267101
--- Diff:
minifi-c2/minifi-c2-commons/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/minifi/c2/model/extension/BundleManifest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.nifi.minifi.c2.model.extension;
+
+import io.swagger.annotations.ApiModel;
+import io.swagger.annotations.ApiModelProperty;
+
+import java.util.List;
+
+@ApiModel
+public class BundleManifest {
+
--- End diff --
I think I like the idea of the direct access to add components. Bundles
are nice for the Java side of the house but don't necessarily map well to C++.
From the standpoint of the flow designer, the notions of bundles should be
minimal but some defined tuple (class, version, etc) would be all that matters
as a keyed extension (which has a fuller model as outlined with the other work
that has gone on in this PR).
---
