[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16661617#comment-16661617
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-4891:
-----------------------------------------
Github user twdsilva commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/363#discussion_r227622543
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/util/UpgradeUtil.java ---
@@ -151,6 +152,14 @@
+ "(TENANT_ID, TABLE_SCHEM, TABLE_NAME, COLUMN_NAME,
COLUMN_FAMILY, BASE_COLUMN_COUNT) "
+ "VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) ";
+ public static final String UPSERT_UPDATE_CACHE_FREQUENCY_FOR_INDEXES =
--- End diff --
nit: rename to UPSERT_UPDATE_CACHE_FREQUENCY
> An index should inherit UPDATE_CACHE_FREQUENCY setting from parent table
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4891
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4891
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Assignee: Chinmay Kulkarni
> Priority: Minor
>
> I tried:
> # creating a table with UPDATE_CACHE_FREQUENCE > 0, then creating a local
> index on the table.
> # creating a table, then creating the local index, then altering the table
> setting UPDATE_CACHE_FREQUENCY to > 0
> In both cases the local index did not inherit the setting, verified both by
> looking at SYSTEM.CATALOG, as well by behavior.
> Update: This also happens for a global index.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
