[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16349508#comment-16349508
 ] 

Sergio Peña commented on SENTRY-2109:
-------------------------------------

[~kkalyan] Isn't this logic going to be on hold now that we know it will be 
fixed on the HMS side? 

> Fix the logic of identifying HMS out of Sync and handle gaps and 
> out-of-sequence notifications.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SENTRY-2109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-2109
>             Project: Sentry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Sentry
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.0
>            Reporter: kalyan kumar kalvagadda
>            Assignee: kalyan kumar kalvagadda
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: SENTRY-2109.001.patch, SENTRY-2109.002.patch, 
> SENTRY-2109.003.patch, SENTRY-2109.004.patch, SENTRY-2109.005.patch, 
> SENTRY-2109.006.patch, SENTRY-2109.007.patch, SENTRY-2109.008.patch, 
> SENTRY-2109.009.patch, SENTRY-2109.010.patch, SENTRY-2109.010.patch, 
> SENTRY-2109.011.patch, SENTRY-2109.012.patch, SENTRY-2109.012.patch, 
> SENTRY-2109.012.patch, Screenshot_HMS_NOTIFICATION_LOG.png
>
>
> Currently HMSFollower proactively checks if sentry is out of sync with HMS 
> and initiates full snapshot, if needed.
> There will be false positives with the current logic if there are gaps in the 
> event-id in the notification log sequence.
> This jira is aimed at making that logic robust.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to