[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17718556#comment-17718556
]
Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-7871:
---------------------------------------
Ah ok. So it wasn't necessarily the two-pass approach (parse *.properties in
Java, and then eval those in bash/batch) you were objecting to, so much as
other aspects of the design. Makes sense.
I don't have a strong opinion on yaml vs other formats. Is there a reason
you'd go with YAML today?
> Platform independent config file instead of solr.in.sh and solr.in.cmd
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-7871
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7871
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: scripts and tools
> Affects Versions: 5.2.1
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Major
> Labels: bin/solr
> Attachments: SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch,
> SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch,
> SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch,
> SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch, SOLR-7871.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from SOLR-7043
> The config files {{solr.in.sh}} and {{solr.in.cmd}} are currently executable
> batch files, but all they do is to set environment variables for the start
> scripts on the format {{key=value}}
> Suggest to instead have one central platform independent config file e.g.
> {{bin/solr.yml}} or {{bin/solrstart.properties}} which is parsed by
> {{SolrCLI.java}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
