dsmiley commented on PR #2126: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2126#issuecomment-1876136104
Agreed that 9.5 should not be released without reconciling the two approaches. I think I would prefer to revert SOLR-17079 as it exists today, then merge this PR SOLR-17096 (after whatever changes in the review process), then do a quick (?) follow-up PR for SOLR-17079 to return the essential functionality building on what's here. Do you think that hypothetical PR would be straight-forward? You raised concerns a while back that what Paul is doing here would maybe be too much work, if I recall. I don't think it's important/necessary to layer them as you did for replica placement. That adds greater support requirements (testing that both can be used coherently) and nobody has asked for that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
