Bruno Lowagie wrote: > It goes without saying that I prefer option [1], but unfortunately > I don't have the time to dig into this problem today and tomorrow > (maybe on Friday).
I filled in the Employee name of the online example twice; once with Adobe Reader, and once with iText. Then I compared the XFA streams in both files. This was the difference I found: 829,840c829 < <form xmlns="http://www.xfa.org/schema/xfa-form/2.6/"; checksum="e6LLKmMc12S29ylJUomRBWdXKjs="> < <subform name="form1"> < <instanceManager name="_"/> < <subform> < <area name="Body"> < <field name="EmployeeName"> < <value override="1"/> < </field> < </area> < </subform> < </subform> < </form> --- > <form xmlns="http://www.xfa.org/schema/xfa-form/2.6/"; checksum="8kRVXiAR3H1FE54D7xQX9HKDqH8="></form> As soon as I have the time, I'll try looking up if this could cause Reader Enabling to break. (I also found some other differences that need further investigation, but hopefully more about them later on.) br, Bruno ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Do you like iText? Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php Or leave a tip: https://tipit.to/itexttipjar
