I will hasten to add that the work is to support the addition of open source reference applications to Tizen IVI, if anyone has any spare change to contribute?
Kind Regards Matt Jones ------------------- Senior Technical Specialist - Infotainment Vice President GENIVI Jaguar Land Rover UK: G/26/2 G02 Building 523, Engineering Centre, Gaydon, Warwick, CV35 ORR US: One World Trade Center, 121 SW Salmon St, 11th Floor, Portland, Oregon, 97204 Email: [email protected] Mobile: +44 (0) 7774 336990 / 87120990 Cell: +1 971 282 1899 ------------------- Business Details: Jaguar Land Rover Limited Registered Office: Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry CV3 4LF Registered in England No: 1672070 This e-mail and any attachments contain confidential information for a specific individual and purpose. The information is private and privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please e-mail us immediately. We apologise for any inconvenience caused but you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. This e-mail does not constitute an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official purchase order. On 16 August 2013 12:11, Clark, Joel <[email protected]> wrote: > I would prefer that nobody get in the habit of using snapshots unless they > know exactly why daily does not work for what they are trying to do. Too > often I see third parties referring to snapshot/latest is their reference > for a new development project. For example JLR is negotiating a 250K Euro > contract with Ixonos now and they referred to snapshots/.../20130711.x as > the reference for their work for the next 2-3 months. > We also have the example of ISG/PED who is still using a > snapshot/.../20120924.x image as the base for all of their Baytrail > development and validation. > > Let's move folks away from this behavior > > Regards > Joel > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Graydon, Tracy > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 11:55 AM > To: Zheng, Yanshuang; VanCutsem, Geoffroy; Ylinen, Mikko > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Tizen IVI repositories enabled by default in the image > > This is a perfect time to re-ask the question that Geoffroy asked the > other day... > > Should we change the default repo to be daily instead of snapshots? If QA > is testing daily images against snapshot repos because that is the default, > that's a good argument for changing the default to daily. > > The question then becomes: how do our customers use the daily images? I am > willing to bet they really don't want the bleeding (possibly broken) edge. > In fact, the official stance is that, in general, we don't really want > anyone other than developers using snapshots. The are there for engineering > and development use and convenience. Customers and others use them at their > own risk. > > Based on that assumptionŠassuming it is validŠI think we should default to > daily instead. > > Anyone think differently? Thoughts? > > > > On 8/16/13 2:57 AM, "Zheng, Yanshuang" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > [Yanshuang] 'zypper up' is tested but at a weekly basis instead of > >> > daily. Often QA install the latest daily build in last week(e.g. US > >> > Thursday) and then test 'zypper up' on this Thursday or Friday(PRC). > >> > That is to ensure system upgrade to latest snapshot could be > >> > conducted smoothly and the upgrade won't break system startup. > > > >> Thanks for confirming this Yanshuang. Wouldn't it make more sense to > >>test updates to the latest daily build instead of snapshot? Correct > >>me if I'm wrong but snapshot could be pretty broken so it could make > >>it hard to verify whether it's the build itself which is broken or > >>the upgrade process? > >> > > > >[Yanshuang] "upgrade to latest snapshot" is because, currently the > >default enabled repo for all daily releases is the snapshot repo. > >QA test this without any repo re-configuration, assuming changing repo > >configuration is not a common case for general users. > >We are OK to test against daily repo if there is kinds of feedback from > >customers. > >And if the default enabled repo is switched to the daily one, our > >'zypper up' would test the upgrade against daily repo. > >_______________________________________________ > >IVI mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi > > _______________________________________________ > IVI mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi > _______________________________________________ > IVI mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi >
_______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
