On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Counihan, Tom <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3647 > > http://www.wpcentral.com/nokia-adding-bluetooth-support-message-access-profile-map-future-update > > http://www.samsung.com/global/business/mobile/product/smartphone/SM-G900FZDAO2U-spec > > http://www-support-downloads.sonymobile.com/c5302/whitepaper_EN_C5302_C5303_C5306_xperia_sp_3.pdf > > Then to benchmark against the 'competition': > > http://www.qnx.com/developers/docs/660/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.qnx.doc.qnxcar2.system_architecture%2Ftopic%2FMDG_bluetooth.html > > The above is not extensive, I stopped after 10min googling. > > Summary, to question BT MAP's relevance or adoption may be premature. > > Look here - this is 2011. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTdIrJKtxNE I had made a POC of evolution-map (using Evolution as the front-end for demo purposes) nearly 2 years ago. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkgylMvMs6w (Email) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htXLG47qvL4 (SMS) Thanks, -Srini. > > Finally, anyone subscribed to the BT sig in this area will note the > traffic is red-hot on the topic. > > > Ultimately, this tread isn't really a technical open, rather how are > 'market requirements' managed. It isn't clear how we determine what is > relevant or not. But if we simply apply gut engineering judgment, there is > a big risk of missing the mark with being relevant for the vertical/market > we focus on and are chasing. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IVI [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kis, Zoltan > > Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:40 AM > > To: Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: email-service > > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Just to get this right, are you proposing the development of a new > > >> email sync solution based on the Tizen Watch notification model?? > > >> > > >> You mean something like Bluetooth MAP, just 'done right'? Have you > > >> checked the MAP spec? Wouldn't it be just more easier implementing > > >> *that* standardized solution - and see how many phone manufacturers > > >> actually take the burden of implementing it... not many. > > >> > > >> I wonder how many device manufacturers will then implement this > > >> specific Samsung solution... > > >> > > >> > > > > > > I am not proposing to adopt the Samsung code and standardized services > > > like MAP would be good to support but it is still very immature and > > > mostly not available in phones in use today by the public. > > > > I expect MAP gets some more traction in the years to come, so it's good > to > > support it, especially if we already have the code. > > > > If we are looking at the email feature, I think we already have the > technology > > and the people to solve the proposed use cases. That doesn't exclude of > > course other ideas, actually we can explore them in more depth, and > > prototypes are welcome. > > > > > > > > I was rather looking at the use case than to the technology. > > > The Tizen Watch, proposes to unify all messages services (not only > > > mail) and I think that is could be a real value. > > > > I know unified messaging well from past life, and of course I know its > value, > > but perhaps we need a bit wider scaling technology than what Tizen Watch > is > > using at the moment. Two choices: we either let apps do it as a sum of > parts, > > or we support it integrated from the platform (which may not be to > > everyone's like). If we choose to support such features in the platform, > > again, there are proven technologies for that. That again doesn't > exclude this > > idea, but we should not jump on the first match, either. > > In my experience we can do unified messaging quite well from apps (as sum > > of parts), unlike telephony for instance (where there are common > resources > > to arbitrate). > > > > Best regards, > > Zoltan > > _______________________________________________ > > IVI mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Shannon Limited > Registered in Ireland > Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare > Registered Number: 308263 > Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the > sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others > is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender and delete all copies. > > > _______________________________________________ > IVI mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi >
_______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
