> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dominig Ar Foll [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 2:57 PM
> To: Wang, Quanxian
> Cc: Jussi Laako; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Simultaneous multi-user multi-seat architecture
>
> 2014-10-20 7:59 GMT+02:00 Wang, Quanxian <[email protected]>:
> > I raise my concerns and need more discussion on multiple-user, multiple-
> display, multiple-seat.
> >
> > I have found multiple-display, multiple-seat are discussed and developed
> under multiple-user. I don't think it is a good idea for IVI automotive.
> >
> AGL and Genivi which are the representative of the Automotive industry
> believe it is. I honestly beleive that that they know better than us.
> The multi user requirement for Tizen were directly extracted from Genivi
> requirement.
[Wang, Quanxian] It is not conflict with this definition. I don't think
multi-display, multi-seat should be developed under multi-user.
It is different. N:n, 1:n are all accepted. One user, multiple-display,
multiple-seat. It will be more convenient in one car.
>
>
> > We are doing the investigation on one user with multiple displays, multiple
> seat.
> >
> > In one car, we don't need to login with different users. We just provide the
> display for every user. Every user has his own display and do what they want
> to do.
>
> Once again, car manufacturers are planning to use user login, obvioulsy not
> by login name and password but by using key FOB, Camera or BT phone
> pairing. The main requirement for login is enforcement of data privacy and
> personalization.
[Wang, Quanxian] For privacy, permission control. Multi user will be fine. But
in one car, do you really need that?
At least, I don't think multiple displays are not related with much more
privacy. It should focus on the convenience how to use IVI system.
> >
> > It seems like the discussion like this. But the difference is no multiple
> > user.
> >
> > Currently we have implemented one demo. One user has one display, they
> could do action on their own display without conflict. For example, listen
> music, play games, navigator separately by different customers. No conflict
> happens. (Actually they are under the same user, however who cares, user
> just focus their own apps).
> >
> Sorry data privacy protection is a key requirement and single user mode
> cannot deliver it.
>
> If you happen to be in Shanghai at TDC, this week, come to talk to me F2F if
> you have more question.
[Wang, Quanxian] Sorry. I am in BJ. :(
>
> Regards
>
> Dominig
_______________________________________________
IVI mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
