> -----Original Message----- > From: IVI [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wang, Quanxian > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 12:06 AM > To: Dominig Ar Foll > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Simultaneous multi-user multi-seat architecture > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dominig Ar Foll [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 2:57 PM > > To: Wang, Quanxian > > Cc: Jussi Laako; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Simultaneous multi-user multi-seat architecture > > > > 2014-10-20 7:59 GMT+02:00 Wang, Quanxian <[email protected]>: > > > I raise my concerns and need more discussion on multiple-user, multiple- > > display, multiple-seat. > > > > > > I have found multiple-display, multiple-seat are discussed and developed > > under multiple-user. I don't think it is a good idea for IVI automotive. > > > > > AGL and Genivi which are the representative of the Automotive industry > > believe it is. I honestly beleive that that they know better than us. > > The multi user requirement for Tizen were directly extracted from Genivi > > requirement. > [Wang, Quanxian] It is not conflict with this definition. I don't think > multi- > display, multi-seat should be developed under multi-user. > It is different. N:n, 1:n are all accepted. One user, multiple-display, > multiple- > seat. It will be more convenient in one car.
Ignoring the security implications is *always* more convenient. If you only have a single set of people who use the car, and they are all responsible to each other, of course you could use a single user. > > > > > > > We are doing the investigation on one user with multiple displays, > multiple > > seat. > > > > > > In one car, we don't need to login with different users. We just provide > the > > display for every user. Every user has his own display and do what they > want > > to do. > > > > Once again, car manufacturers are planning to use user login, obvioulsy not > > by login name and password but by using key FOB, Camera or BT phone > > pairing. The main requirement for login is enforcement of data privacy and > > personalization. > [Wang, Quanxian] For privacy, permission control. Multi user will be fine. But > in one car, do you really need that? > At least, I don't think multiple displays are not related with much more > privacy. It should focus on the convenience how to use IVI system. You don't have kids, do you? Or friends? You're clearly not a member of a carpool. And you never earn extra money with Uber. > > > > > > It seems like the discussion like this. But the difference is no multiple > user. > > > > > > Currently we have implemented one demo. One user has one display, > they > > could do action on their own display without conflict. For example, listen > > music, play games, navigator separately by different customers. No conflict > > happens. (Actually they are under the same user, however who cares, user > > just focus their own apps). > > > > > Sorry data privacy protection is a key requirement and single user mode > > cannot deliver it. > > > > If you happen to be in Shanghai at TDC, this week, come to talk to me F2F if > > you have more question. > [Wang, Quanxian] Sorry. I am in BJ. :( > > > > Regards > > > > Dominig > _______________________________________________ > IVI mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
