> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jussi Laako [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 5:53 PM
> To: Wang, Quanxian
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Simultaneous multi-user multi-seat architecture
>
> On 20.10.2014 11:08, Wang, Quanxian wrote:
> >> I don't want to share my Facebook, Twitter and email account
> >> configurations with anybody else. How would you ensure this doesn't
> happen in your model?
> >>
> >> (yes, there have been cars on market already for years with built-in
> >> twitter and facebook support)
> > [Wang, Quanxian]Is it related with multiple display? Multiple seat? No.
>
> Yes it is. Let's say there are two persons at the backseat, they both want to
> read and write emails on their own accounts. Post on twitter and facebook.
>
> They also sync their contacts from their smartphone to the car's system so
> that they can easily send emails without remembering everyone's email
> address.
>
> They also sync all their photos from a phone to watch those on a larger
> display.
[Wang, Quanxian] It is very good if you want multiple user to protect privacy.
That is fine. But do you need to bind multiple seat, multiple display with
multiple user. They should not have direct links. I don't think multiple seat
designer like to bind it to multiple users scope. At least for weston/wayland,
they just want to bind it to their own display instead of multiple-user.
This is an idea not related with privacy. It is the design idea for your
multiple seats, multiple displays. Please don't always bind shared hardware
resource into your multiple user scope.
One clear example is multiple apps could rendering in one GPU. They don't need
multiple users or single user idea in their rendering process.
_______________________________________________
IVI mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
