On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Wang, Quanxian <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jussi Laako [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:17 PM > > To: Wang, Quanxian > > Cc: Lukasz Pawelczyk; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Simultaneous multi-user multi-seat architecture > > > > On 23.10.2014 5:18, Wang, Quanxian wrote: > > > If you bind UID with multiple displays, you will find a conflict. > > > > Which conflict? We have a working setup. > [Wang, Quanxian] Suppose a case. A family has F(father), M(mother), > Son(S), Daughter(D) > They are all drivers. They have one car with Tizen IVI system. There are 4 > seats for driver(front-left), others are customers(Front-right, Back-left, > Back-right). > This is where the misunderstanding is. There's only once seat for driver (as you would expect to have in a car). Any user can log in to that seat. Today: F - seat0, M - seat1 (for example) Tomorrow: M - seat0, taking her son to school sitting on front passenger seat: S - seat1 > Every one has his own account on this Tizen IVI system. Every one maybe > the driver and customer. > In this setup, there would be no "roles" like this (other than the 'guest' user without login identity vs. normal users with login identity) Today, F is driver, you bind F with front-left display. Tomorrow, M is > driver, do you want M use this display, or you want to reconfigure it? > Customer or driver is not tizen ivi configure expert. > > So, the ideal case is that 'Any user who login into the Tizen IVI system > should have the chance to select the visible and free displays as he want > automatically instead of static binding'. > This is what we are working on. -- Mikko
_______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
