On wto, 2014-10-21 at 17:01 +0300, Jussi Laako wrote: > On 21.10.2014 15:06, Lukasz Pawelczyk wrote: > > I think you all misunderstand mr Wang a little. This discussion is around > > whether we can take multiple user out of the picture (for multiple displays > > and seats) where most of you seem to suggest that this is what Wang is > > suggesting here. > > That's already supported by the current model, no need for changes. > > > If someone will want to make 2 displays per one user, fine, let him. If > > someone doesn't want multiple users at all (for whatever reason), fine, let > > him. If someone wants strictly one display+seat+user let him as well. But > > don't limit the options. > > Nothing is preventing that already...
So why are you so against preserving them? This discussion went sideways at least 10 emails ago. All that was said was not to merge multi-seat/multi-display with multi-user on the implementation (weston/wayland) side. All the rest is one big misunderstanding because people understood that mr. Wang wanted multi-seat/multi-display without multi-user in the end product. He didn't. -- Lukasz Pawelczyk Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
