A lot of discussion, yet the facts are: - there are accepted requirements for the more generic solution - a platform should implement the most generic solution for the accepted requirements, while supporting specific / more limited configurations - a platform should implement mechanisms, not hard-coded policies, but should support a range of policies; therefore hard-coding a policy for a simpler use case doesn't make things simpler for platform code, especially when - the above is already supported and implemented. Looks like Q.E.D.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Lukasz Pawelczyk <[email protected]> wrote: > On śro, 2014-10-22 at 14:54 +0300, Jussi Laako wrote: >> So what does following mean then? >> >> --- begin quote --- >> --- end quote --- > > This has been written after my first mail in this thread. Frankly I'm > confused now as well. My initial understanding was that Wang just wanted > not to artificially tie up things that might not be tied up and he just > expressed his view poorly in the initial emails. > > > -- > Lukasz Pawelczyk > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics > > > > _______________________________________________ > IVI mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
