Sander Sweers wrote:

> The PVR-500 is 2 pvr-150 on 1 card. It has the same problems you would
> normally have with 2 pvr-150's in 1 system or 2 tv's on the same
> cable. The signal is split between the 2 tuners and if the signal
> strength is too low this is could *cause* the symptoms you are
> describing.


If you suspect you have signal strength or SNR problems, some steps you
could take, if you haven't already, are:

1. Ensure you are using 75 ohm splitters that cover your desired
frequency range (55 - 802 MHz for US NTSC broadcast IIRC).

2, Ensure that all unused cable runs, wall jacks, or splitter outputs
are properly terminated in a 75 ohm load.

3. Replace RG-58/U cables with RG-6/U cables.  RG-6/U has about 3 dB
less loss per 100 feet at 400 MHz than RG-58/U according to one
manufacturer.

4. Add a broadband TV amplifier as close as you can to where the signal
comes into your location, ideally before any splitters or long cable
runs.  If you don't also use your cables to receive FM radio signals
and the amplifier has an FM trap, set the FM trap to "IN" to reduce
intermodulation products induced in the tuner by the FM broadcasts in
the 88-108 MHz band.

5. Make sure you have an in-line lightning protection/grounding unit
installed in the cable close to where the signal comes into your
location.  Grounding the shield of the coax protects your gear from
electrical transients induced by nearby lightning, and it happened to
greatly improve the signal quality in my home.


> >  Below is the output of dmesg | grep ivtv.   Do you see anything
> unusual?
> 
> Do not grep for only ivtv but copy the whole init from start to
> finish. See [2] on how to ask for help.
> 
> I see nothing unusual in the output below but we really need to see
> the whole init to be sure.

I didn't see anything unusual either.  But again, the all the init
messages are required to be sure. 

-Andy


_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users

Reply via email to