>No, it's not for licensing questions, but more because it can >evolve with a different cycle, to evolve with eclipse versions >for instance. So I think it's important to be able to release >Ivy and IvyDE separately. But that's the only reason I see.
I think the easiest would be having to (more or less) independend modules in the Ivy project: Ivy Core and IvyDE ... Ant has also several "independant" moduls: Core, AntUnit, AntLib .NET, AntLib SVN, ... Jan
