On 11/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If it's possible to have several modules like that, it would >be nice. But would the ASF be ok for that? Do we have to >submit another proposal? Is eclipse dependency ok according to >ASF licensing policy? While I dont know the policy enough, I think having a 2nd proposal and a 2nd project would be too much work. Should be done inside this proposal.
I agree. Could someone else confirm it makes sense to migrate IvyDE as a sub module of Ivy? Having dependencies on Eclipse should be ok, too. Think of Ant: we have
build time dependencies on 3rd party jars like Weblogic and others. BUT: we dont distribute them and dont have them in our svn-repository.
Ok, thanks for the information. So it seems it may be a good solution to do it like that, if others (mentors?) can confirm they agree on that. Xavier Jan
