On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Mukul Gandhi<[email protected]> wrote: > Another idea that comes to my mind is, to provide a configurable > option to users, to either use the minimal subset (which is the > current implementation), or use full XPath 2.0 support, with > PsychoPath.
Apart from the points I mentioned, in the first post; regarding the above point, we might make the XPath 2.0 subset (which is currently available in Xerces-J) as a default option to users, and the full XPath 2.0 processing, with PsychoPath selectable by user's via a system property. Or should we make the defaults opposite? We use this approach with assertions processing as well, where the PsychoPath engine is default. The user's have option to select another XPath 2.0 engine via the system property. Any thoughts please about this, and the other points I mentioned earlier? If these approaches add value to Xerces-J implementation, I'll be happy to put effort on this (if I am allowed to :)). -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
