it seems, Xerces folks are busy :) I couldn't get a response to this question, since 4 days now (with a 2 day weekend in between) :) I am hoping, a yes or no to this idea.
A no would be ok, with justifications, please. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> wrote: > Apart from the points I mentioned, in the first post; regarding the > above point, we might make the XPath 2.0 subset (which is currently > available in Xerces-J) as a default option to users, and the full > XPath 2.0 processing, with PsychoPath selectable by user's via a > system property. Or should we make the defaults opposite? > > We use this approach with assertions processing as well, where the > PsychoPath engine is default. The user's have option to select another > XPath 2.0 engine via the system property. > > Any thoughts please about this, and the other points I mentioned earlier? > > If these approaches add value to Xerces-J implementation, I'll be > happy to put effort on this (if I am allowed to :)). -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
