Hi Michael, Thanks, for insightful remarks. On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Michael Glavassevich <[email protected]> wrote: > Well... I don't think a user should have to set anything. By default we > could just try to process the XPath expression with the native parser and if > that fails fall back to using PsychoPath. Then you always get the > performance of the native support if your expression falls within the subset > and complete support from PsychoPath for the rest of XPath 2.0.
I agree, and think this is a nice idea. So, we must do like this. > If you're up for it go right ahead. :-) Thanks. I'll begin implementation, for this soon after inheritable attribute changes get committed. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
