Hi Mukul, Patience. :-)
For many of the North American folks we're just coming off a 3-day weekend. For a few like myself it was 4 days (far away from my computer). Need to give this some thought as I catch up on my e-mail. Will get back to you. Thanks. Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> wrote on 09/07/2009 12:10:49 PM: > it seems, Xerces folks are busy :) I couldn't get a response to this > question, since 4 days now (with a 2 day weekend in between) :) I am > hoping, a yes or no to this idea. > > A no would be ok, with justifications, please. > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Apart from the points I mentioned, in the first post; regarding the > > above point, we might make the XPath 2.0 subset (which is currently > > available in Xerces-J) as a default option to users, and the full > > XPath 2.0 processing, with PsychoPath selectable by user's via a > > system property. Or should we make the defaults opposite? > > > > We use this approach with assertions processing as well, where the > > PsychoPath engine is default. The user's have option to select another > > XPath 2.0 engine via the system property. > > > > Any thoughts please about this, and the other points I mentioned earlier? > > > > If these approaches add value to Xerces-J implementation, I'll be > > happy to put effort on this (if I am allowed to :)). > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
