I think our code is not that much different.... - I put the state procedures 'inline', saving a stack level, a bit faster and smaller. - I receive and transmit from a buffer and have a user code part to process this buffer at the right (well, almost right) moment.(I don't know how to activate start/stop interrupts but I would like them). - I don't have any code in state 5 (and that might be an issue...)
I would like to see how you're going to interface between the main code and the lib. Unless it is worth while this interface have it both your an my way, I see no reason to have both libs. This will only be confusing for jallib users. Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
