Hi Joep, Nice to read this. Though we already talked about having such "super include" libs (there were named "EZ" libs by that time). Sure we could provide this. About regression tests, you can also use unittests, at least for non-18F PICs (OK, I had to say that :)).
About these libs, the main problem I can see is... > > 1. include the super-include and change all function calls from bert > to jal format. > 2. move the required part of the super-include to you program and > remove the super include itself. ... will people get to this step #2 ? I guess no, they'll stay on step 1., because once it's working, it's kept "as is". So this is not really *conversion* procedure, but a new level in our libraries, one step above current libs. I used to be in favor of providing such "ez" libs (or "super include" libs), but now I have doubts. I know some points are still too complicated in jallib, like clock configuration (and some fuse settings in general). We should work on this too, to improve usability. Except this, I think this is not about being too complicated or not, this is, IMHO, a matter of documentation, we have to provide more, high quality documentation. My 2.10-2$ Seb -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
