Hi Seb,
Sebastien Lelong wrote: > jalv2 2.4m-beta is far slower to compile than 2.4l, buildbot produces a > timeout, after something like 1200 seconds... > > Can someone confirm it's slower ? On the contrary! I have a little script to compile samples. When I run this script on my system with 2.4l it takes 106 seconds, with 2.4m only 78 seconds to compile 227 samples (all except the blink samples). So in my experience 2.4m is significantly faster. Note: I ran the script several times after each other without any other active applications to eliminate disk caching effects. The times were consistent. Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
