> > > Just an idea. My script to compile all samples uses the SVN directory > structure (not the release structure with a single /lib include > directory). For the '-s' compiler parameter a string of > include-directories is built, but only those directories are included > which actually contain any .jal files. This string is with me about 800 > bytes and contains 25 directories. > When I remember correctly you do a similar thing, but are you also > selective (skipping empty directories)? >
No, I'm not selective, but it behaves the same whatever the compiler. This might explain differences between your measures and mine, but not within a same system. Now, about compiling from sources (from another mail), I was quite sure you didn't modify sources, but you may have different compilation arguments, which would result in a better optimized binary. Again, I don't know what would be the factor (I used to be a Gentoo user, and like any Gentoo users, claimed compiling from sources allows incredible optimizations, but I now have doubts about incredible...) > > A factor 10 is too much for the difference in processor alone. There > must be other factors too, like disk I/O or operating system performance. > > Yes, you're right about that too, and my HD is quite slow, and OS is swapping quite much... Cheers, -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
