Hi Seb,
Sebastien Lelong wrote: > I have only 539 samples after I removed some this morning. And I have > only 'elapsed' time (probably your real time) on an otherwise empty > system. I did 3 runs with each compiler. > > 2.4l 199.02 186.24 186.28 > 2.4m 138.82 136.35 136.55 > (times in seconds) > > The very first measurement is somewhat longer (or better formulated: the > others are shorter) because of disk caching. The third and fourth column > are consistent and show that 2.4m is almost 25% faster than 2.4l on my > system. > > > I think it's maybe about compiler's compilation itself. I guess you're > using it under eCom, right ? So this means yo compiled jalv2 from > sources ? I did use binary distribution (so "jalv2" exec in zip). Yes, my measurements were with eCS and an eCS(OS/2) executable built from the compiler sources. But I can hardly believe that this would make such a difference. I did not change anything in the source! > > I see that in absolute sense my system is about 10 times faster than > yours. That surprises me: I have certainly not an extreme PC with an AMD > Athlon 64 X2 3800 processor. And only a single processor is really used > in this case because the compiler is single threaded and so is the > script (no parallel compilations). > > > > My server is: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz, with 512MB RAM. So mine > running slower isn't a surprise for me, now 10 times may be a little bit > too much ? I'll see if I can do comparable measurements under Linux or Windows. Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
