{changed the subject}Sebastien Lelong wrote: > I think it's maybe about compiler's compilation itself. I guess you're > using it under eCom, right ? So this means yo compiled jalv2 from > sources ? I did use binary distribution (so "jalv2" exec in zip). Just an idea. My script to compile all samples uses the SVN directory structure (not the release structure with a single /lib include directory). For the '-s' compiler parameter a string of include-directories is built, but only those directories are included which actually contain any .jal files. This string is with me about 800 bytes and contains 25 directories. When I remember correctly you do a similar thing, but are you also selective (skipping empty directories)? Regardless the string length, your system may be slower in searching directories than mine. You may also happen to have a different sequence of directories, which could make the search for libraries slower. > My server is: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz, with 512MB RAM. So mine > running slower isn't a surprise for me, now 10 times may be a little bit > too much ? A factor 10 is too much for the difference in processor alone. There must be other factors too, like disk I/O or operating system performance. Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
