Hi William William wrote: > On Nov 29, 3:32 pm, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: >> ad 1: useless to discuss it further without proper arguments > > Hi Rob, > > I'm sorry you don't find this discussion useful. I'll try and improve > it.
I said 'without proper arguments'. And so far I have not heard one decisive argument why a special "Jal bootloader" would be needed. I don't consider "prove that you can write a bootloader in Jal" as a good argument: who needs such proof? Regards, Rob. -- Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
