On Nov 30, 2:12 am, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: > I said 'without proper arguments'. And so far I have not heard one > decisive argument why a special "Jal bootloader" would be needed.
Rob, Perhaps a bootloader in JAL could be useful as a tutorial, and perhaps be more readily understood by a wider audience. I understand that it can't be generic. Why not just wait and see what happens? I see no reason for trying to squash the idea. If you don't want to help, that is fine. But please, don't pour cold water on it either. In fact, its been done already -- Wouter's done a few, and there is one for the USB cpus, already in the JALLIB. I have plans to do a JAL bootloader for some of the CAN cpus. William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
