Well, now devices were modified but, It wasn't possible something like
this?
if defined(OPTION_REG) then
make the required alias inside library?
Adding a new register for devices which don't physically have it, will
not break some standards?
Vasi
On Aug 29, 9:22 pm, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Burt,
>
> On 08/29/10 04:20 pm, Burt Ratliff wrote:
>
> > There is no OPTION_REG It's called T0CON on the 18fchips I made a
> > copy of timer0_isr_interval
> > renamed it and clanged the naming it work find now for the 18fchips
>
> You are right, but we were ahead of you! It is one of the changes of the
> soon to be released 0.6 version Jallib! But we have chosen for another
> approach: the device files of the midrange and baseline PICs have gotten
> aliases for OPTION_REG fields to mimic the existence of a T0CON
> register. So now a single timer0 library supports both the 18Fs aas
> well as the baseline and midrange PICs.
>
> Regards, Rob.
>
> --
> R. Hamerling, Netherlands ---http://www.robh.nl
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
