Hi, On Aug 30, 10:22 am, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/29/10 09:39 pm, funlw65 wrote: > > Where were you while this was discussed in Jallib and with issue 111 > (Jan/Feb 2010)! > > The main goal of the device files is to hide the differences between > PICs from the (function) libraries and thus make it possible to write > device independent libraries. In this case a few aliases were added to > the device files of baseline and midrange. I don't see how that would > 'break' something. >
Te reason seems ok but may create some JAL dependencies :) - you know, inability to port some libraries to other compilers? The need to have same device files on the targeted compiler? If we relate strictly to JAL, it's ok so, never mind. Vasi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
