Hi Rob, I had a look at just the first datasheet appearing in your commit diff from pinmap.py (16F1826 IIRC). Indeed SPI pins now have a suffix number (eg. SCL => SCL1). I was quite surprised you mention this error, regarding datasheet parsing, because as I can remember, I don't know how I could have strip the suffix (so SCL1 would have become SCL during parsing).
Datasheet has a date at the end of each page, 2011. This may explain the differences. Maybe there's a kind of normalization from Microchip guys... Cheers, Seb 2011/2/16 <[email protected]> > Updates: > Status: Fixed > > Comment #11 on issue 136 by robhamerling: Alias SPI pin names in device > files > > http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=136 > > Unnumbered aliases for pins of the first of multiple I2C and SPI madules > are now generated by dev2jal script and removed from pinmap.py. A compare of > the latest device files with the previous set revealed a number of errors > and omissions in pinmap.py. All seems OK now, issue closed. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
