Hi Seb,
On 2011/02/17 18:06, Sebastien Lelong wrote:
I had a look at just the first datasheet appearing in your commit diff from pinmap.py (16F1826 IIRC). Indeed SPI pins now have a suffix number (eg. SCL => SCL1). I was quite surprised you mention this error, regarding datasheet parsing, because as I can remember, I don't know how I could have strip the suffix (so SCL1 would have become SCL during parsing).
Do I understand you correctly that you think the errors are yours? I don't think so! At the time of your datasheet parsing effort for pinmap.py the datasheet for the 16f1826 may not have been there at all! All later pinmap-py updates (at least mine) were done by 'manual' editing. But here and there I forgot to add unnumbered aliases for SPI or I2C pins. Nobody ever reported these errors, and I discovered these more or less by accident. Since I was sure I would make more of such errors in the future I decided to automate the alias-generation and now it is completely in the dev2jal script. It was a piece of cake and I should have done that from the beginning!
Datasheet has a date at the end of each page, 2011. This may explain the differences. Maybe there's a kind of normalization from Microchip guys...
The newer 4-digit 16Fs are indeed much better architected! Regards, Rob. -- R. Hamerling, Netherlands --- http://www.robh.nl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
