My reason is just that it is not easy for a new person to do this if they have no clue about SVN. Also, we should not have to do support for other software like tortoise.
> I haven't heard a reason why it should be optional. I didn't hear a reason that it should be mandatory. We did well without it before. Anyways, let's see how it goes with others. Matt. On Aug 8, 5:09 am, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Seb, Matt, > > I haven't heard a reason why it should be optional. I think (at least) > all files in TORELEASE should have a revision code. > > Regards, Rob. > > On 08/08/11 10:48 am, Sebastien Lelong wrote: > > > > > but that would mean some files would be tracked, other wouldn't. I'' ok > > to make it optional, but would like other's opinion first > > cheers > > seb > > > Le 8 ao t 2011 10:32, "mattschinkel" <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> a crit : > > > I think it is useful and I will use it, however it should be optional. > > > > Matt. > > > > On Aug 8, 4:19 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > wrote: > > >> but you have right-click ;) > > >> see properties, and select svn:keywords > > > >> I'll update JSG to show exact lines to add to the config. yes everybody > > >> have to do this, but this is a one time setting. don't you think it's > > >> useful? it actually help gathering which version users are using when > > >> reporting bug (when file comes from svn, not from a release archive) > > > >> cheers > > >> seb > > -- > R. Hamerling, Netherlands ---http://www.robh.nl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
