A beginner should get accustomed to '--' comment as is part of JAL and JAL
is not C or other language. Period. The beginner is here to learn JAL, as
the C for PIC is commercial (xc8) or not having enough support and
producing very bad code (SDCC). And JAL has '--' as a comment among another
one.

So, please keep developing JAL as JAL.

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:20 PM Rob CJ <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
>
> Again I was too quick. It seems to work (but I remain careful here).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rob
>
> ------------------------------
> *Van:* 'Mike' via jallib <[email protected]>
> *Verzonden:* donderdag 26 november 2020 22:00
> *Aan:* jallib <[email protected]>
> *Onderwerp:* Re: [jallib] Re: How to improve the popularity of JAL?
>
> No problem
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
> On Thursday, November 26, 2020 at 3:57:09 PM UTC-5 [email protected]
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Maybe I was too soon with my response. The '--' cannot be compared with
> '//' since a construction like a / b would no longer work. It would require
> more work than a single fix.
>
> Sorry for making you happy with a dead sparrow (Dutch saying).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *Van:* [email protected] <[email protected]> namens
> [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Verzonden:* donderdag 26 november 2020 21:40
> *Aan:* jallib <[email protected]>
> *Onderwerp:* [jallib] Re: How to improve the popularity of JAL?
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I thought that since the compiler handles '--' as comment it might as well
> be modified easily to also accept '//' as comment so I added the '//' as
> test to the compiler and that seems to work. The only disadvantage is that
> the syntax highlighting with JALEdit and JALIDE does not change since it
> does not recognize it as comments but it will still syntax highlighting the
> keywords.
>
> So  this now passes the modified version of the compiler:
>
> // My forever loop
> forever loop
>    led = ON
>    _usec_delay(100_000)  // Comment
>    led = OFF
>    _usec_delay(400_000)
> end loop
>
> In the above example the keyword 'forever' is syntax highlighted in the
> forever loop as well in the text 'My forever loop' so that is a bit
> confusing. I do not think that JALEdit will be changed but I do think that
> it could be fixed in JALIDE since Despx has been working on that.
>
> So with this change the compiler would accept ';' '--' and '//' for
> comment. Not sure what other think of this change. The request to have
> multiple comment lines using /* ... */ is not easy to fix.
>
> If others think this is a welcomed change I can implement it in a final
> release of the compiler.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rob
>
>
> Op maandag 23 november 2020 om 22:26:15 UTC+1 schreef Mike:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> My thanks as well for all of your efforts.
>
> A few things that come to mind that I have given thought to in the past:
>
> * I agree that YouTube videos would help.  So many people are using
> YouTube to get started in things.
>
> * Whenever I start working with a new PIC I'm surprised that the "sample"
> programs are almost all using crystals.  I take the sample program for my
> new PIC and change it to use the internal oscillator.  I think the internal
> oscillator should be the default sample program as it's easier to get going
> and not everyone may have crystals on hand.
>
> * Some of the home page links are confusing.  The "jallib" support link
> does lead here, but the "jallist" support link doesn't go to the Google
> group.  The "jallib" main site link goes to a no longer used Google code
> archive.  These might be confusing to newcomers.  I'm also not sure of
> the difference between the "jallist" and "jallib" groups.
>
> * I'm not sure if it's clear on the home page how to install JAL or how to
> update it when a new "bee" is released.
>
> * One Microchip forum user commented about JAL, earlier in the year:
> " There are some things about the JAL language that I don't like. For
> instance, why use "--" for comments rather than the more standard "//" or
> "/* ... */" pair? Well, they are standard in C, C++, and the "//" in
> Delphi. The "--" is used in Ada and several other languages, and there are
> many others:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comment_(computer_programming)
>
> I see that neither Delphi nor JAL are listed in that Wiki page. Maybe they
> should be added. "
>
> * One thing I personally don't like about JAL is the libraries' use of
> lowercase, which I find difficult to read.  There have been a few libraries
> that I have created before they existed in JAL, but have been hesitant to
> contribute them since I don't like conforming to the all lowercase standard.
>
> Just some thoughts.  Don't take them as criticisms, but as honest feedback.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> On Monday, November 23, 2020 at 12:42:38 PM UTC-5 [email protected]
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking for ways to improve the popularity of JAL and I would like to
> hear your reaction on this topic.
>
> Currently JAL is still maintained, that is new device files are generated
> when new PICs are released, compiler issues are fixed (if possible) and new
> libraries are released. In 2020,  libraries where created for the following
> devices:  nRF24L01+ transceiver, digital potentiometers X9C102, X9C103,
> X9C104, X9C503, TM1637, SSD1306 graphics display module, nRF905
> transceiver, Si5351a clock generator and a library for DFPlayer Mini.
>
> I would like to see that more people use JAL and more people would like to
> contribute.
>
> Some ideas to get more people interested:
> -) Add more libraries (not sure which though)
> -) Create a multi-platform IDE (Windows, Linux, Mac)
> -) Post Youtube video's about getting started with JAL
> -) Extend the JAL language (not possible by me since fixing compiler bugs
> is not the same as extending the compiler with new features)
> -) ....
>
> Looking forward to your suggestions.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rob
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/a567d3e4-95fb-4fec-b549-6af25281ec92n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/a567d3e4-95fb-4fec-b549-6af25281ec92n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/b6e6cc81-3fda-481e-a931-cd5cec340107n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/b6e6cc81-3fda-481e-a931-cd5cec340107n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jallib" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/VI1PR07MB62563EFD68D17FBF74EF1FA6E6F90%40VI1PR07MB6256.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/VI1PR07MB62563EFD68D17FBF74EF1FA6E6F90%40VI1PR07MB6256.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
Vasi

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jallib/CABsDq%3D8y_9O%2BRnvNkMkwh4ysx%2B0%3DyhNaCPKs5JMP%3D0Q75wk9Lg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to