----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Scheduler Interface
> > So propose an alternate interface. > > I did. And one that supports BOTH implementations. Make a formal proposal and ask for Vote for next release. And I agree that we should talk about change but not for this release. Here are the dates that were sent out.(by Peter) ---------------------- Feature Freeze: 10/3/02 Code Freeze: 10/11/02 Doc Freeze: 10/11/02 Branch Date: 10/20/02 Formal Test Period: 10/12/02 - 10/20/02 Release Date: 10/21/02 ---------------------- > > > Propose and implementation and measure the benefit. > > Why is that problematic with this approach ? > > I believe in proper design. As the IBM paper mentions, proper DESIGN is the > most important issue with multi-threading. It is hard and time consuming to > load test a multithreaded implementation, and even though I am willing to > spend some time doing so, I really have my own work to do. This is not the time to redesign. Please do impact analysis Harmeet -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
