> Peter, the proposal for watchdog change has been put out an hour or so
back
> and I sent some questions on it.

That is simply not so.  The proposal first made months ago, the code was
revised, and submitted more formally a week ago.  Not an hour ago.

In any event, I've been answering your questions.  I don't know where Andrei
is, these days, but I do thank him in absentia for his efforts.

> Expected freeze was on 10th and you still haven't posted a bug fixed
patch.

This debate has delayed that submission, Harmeet.  Else we could have spent
this time testing and working instead of debating.

> I prefer patching the server with better scheduler for now.

I don't, but I'm perfectly happy to offer the choice of implementation.

> I agree the interface to manage timouts/(or scheduler for timeouts)
> needs changes but I don't want to cross the hill today.

It was crossed in June, July, August and October by a whole group of
developers.  It isn't a new issue.

        --- Noel


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to