The reason for my concern has been 2 fold. - I don't believe there will be an improvement with watchdog. I don't think all of Peter's patch has been posted. Danny you tried the posted patch and it made things worse for you. If the patch did improve performance/scalability significantly and I could verify it there would not have been as much of an issue. We may be exchanging one set of problems with other.
- I don't think refactoring is needed. There are ways of addressing configuration overhead with current structure. Here is what I would like. Have Peter or Noel put out proposals for vote. Please assume my +1. - If there are two +1 (non Peter)committers votes, or - only one +1(non Peter) and no committer vote for 2 days after a single (non Peter) committer +1. I don't know of a more accomodating way to compromise on this. Does this sound reasonable ? Harmeet ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:22 AM Subject: Peter, Harmeet Will you guys please try to sort your problem out, I have no idea why you are at each others throats on *every* topic, but its getting a bit wearisome. We're not going to get any progress if you can't *both* compromise. d. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
