----- Original Message ----- From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Waiting for Harmeet to send me a version with his code fixed.
Here you are. Thanks for pointing out the mistake. Should have been !Thread.currentThread().isInterruped() instead of Thread.currentThread().isInterruped() If you wan to run a faster comparison and simulate artifical heavy load on server you can - reduce the James mx heap. - reduce thread pools. A simple test would be to send 75% of max thread pool size for a handler. Also the patched James distribution is at http://www.kodemuse.com/pub/harmeet/james.zip Danny would you be able to try this too. thanks, Harmeet
SMTPHandler.java.diff
Description: Binary data
james-config.xml.diff
Description: Binary data
Manifest.mf.diff
Description: Binary data
james-assembly.xml.diff
Description: Binary data
TimeSchedulerImpl.java
Description: Binary data
TimeSchedulerImpl.xinfo
Description: Binary data
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
