----- Original Message -----
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Waiting for Harmeet to send me a version with his code fixed.


Here you are.

Thanks for pointing out the mistake. Should have been
   !Thread.currentThread().isInterruped()
instead of
   Thread.currentThread().isInterruped()

If you wan to run a faster comparison and simulate artifical heavy load on
server you can
- reduce the James mx  heap.
- reduce thread pools.
A simple test would be to send 75% of max thread pool size for a handler.


Also the patched James distribution is at
http://www.kodemuse.com/pub/harmeet/james.zip

Danny would you be able to try this too.

thanks,
Harmeet

Attachment: SMTPHandler.java.diff
Description: Binary data

Attachment: james-config.xml.diff
Description: Binary data

Attachment: Manifest.mf.diff
Description: Binary data

Attachment: james-assembly.xml.diff
Description: Binary data

Attachment: TimeSchedulerImpl.java
Description: Binary data

Attachment: TimeSchedulerImpl.xinfo
Description: Binary data

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to