Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Yes, I didn't mean to imply that this should be relevant to the release. Just flagging it as an issue to address.Let's chill. It is a worthwhile discussion, but not something that needs to be fixed NOW. I think that everyone is antsy about getting the release out.Please re-open the bug with an indication of why you think that the handler should handle this illegal input in a more graceful manner. We can discuss it for v3 and/or v2.1.2 --- Noel
And <deep breath>, I'm sorry I snapped at you Peter. I feel I have a lot of experience with SMTP having built the original and watched James run in production for 4 years, so I was upset that my bug report was so quickly categorized as invalid without a discussion. As you accurately pointed out, I am upset because we butted heads on the pop3-file issue. I felt you categorizing this report as invalid was linked to that discussion, so I escalated rather than dealing with it like an adult.
Kenny, I'm sorry too... you're right to expect more out of a listserv, and I'll try to do a better job with my temper.
--
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies - Unstoppable Websites
http://www.lokitech.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
