Serge, > And <deep breath>, I'm sorry I snapped at you Peter. > I feel I have a > lot of experience with SMTP having built the > original and watched James > run in production for 4 years, so I was upset that > my bug report was so > quickly categorized as invalid without a discussion. > As you accurately > pointed out, I am upset because we butted heads on > the pop3-file issue. > I felt you categorizing this report as invalid was > linked to that > discussion, so I escalated rather than dealing with > it like an adult.
It wasn't. If you honestly feel there are other issues aside from making invalid test cases pass, then those should be put in the bug report. I may not agree with you, but on the basis of the bug report as written (my invalid test cases fail) I still feel that closing it was appropriate. As Noel points out, if you feel there are other issues outstanding (vulnerability to DOS attacks, etc.) you can simply reopen the bug and add the relevant details. I may still disagree with you, but I'm happy to discuss. In any case, apology accepted. --Peter __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
