----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Again, my testing was quite some time ago, shortly after IBM first released
1.3. The current version may be more stable than what I tested with. The
version that I tried was tried on at least three different machines (all
RedHat 6.0 or 6.1 SMP x86 boxes). What tipped me off to the problem was the
fact that HttpSessions would die after a few minutes -- which turned out to
be because the JVM was dying. It appeared to be a problem with garbage
collection.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ben Ricker
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 8:06 AM
To: Java Apache Users
Subject: Re: IBM JDK 1.3
----------------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmm....I have had people tell me that it is more stable then Sun and
others tell me that it crashes right out of the box. I guess I will test
it out myself and try to simulate a load on it.
Ben Ricker
Senior Systems Administrator
US-Rx, inc.
John Corrigan wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
> and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I haven't tried the IBM JDK for several months. However, when I did
> try it there were major stability issues. The JVM would crash about
> every five minutes. This occured both with and without a load. It
> also occured both with JServ 1.1.2 and Tomcat 3.1.
>
> Sun's 1.3 implementation seems to be both faster and more stable than
> their 1.2.2 release. I didn't compare the performance between Sun's
> 1.3 and IBM's 1.3 because of the stability problems.
>
> FWIW,
> John
>
> BERWART Thierry wrote:
>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>> WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
>> and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Hello Ben,
>>
>> Last monday, I installed a server with Jserv 1.2 using the IBM's JVM
>> 1.3 But we had some problems of stability ...
>> JServ crashed after some request ...
>> And now, it's perfectly working with the Sun JVM 1.3 !
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De: Ben Ricker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Date: mardi 9 janvier 2001 15:53
>> À: Java Apache Users
>> Objet: IBM JDK 1.3
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> BEFORE YOU POST, search the faq at <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>> WHEN YOU POST, include all relevant version numbers, log files,
>> and configuration files. Don't make us guess your problem!!!
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I am considering moving from Sun's JVM shipped with JDK 1.2.2 to
>> IBM's JVM shipped with JDK 1.3. I saw no indication that 1.3 is
>> pre-realease but just to be sure I thought I would ask: has anyone
>> had any experience using IBM's JVM 1.3 and Jserv? Is 1.3 a release
>> version as far as you know?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ben Ricker
>> Senior Systems Administrator
>> US-Rx, inc.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Search Archives:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
>> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> --
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Search Archives:
>> <http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
>> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search Archives:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search Archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search Archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/java-apache-users%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
