[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741849#action_12741849
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1794:
-------------------------------------

So what do you propose  ? You would just cast to CachingTokenFilter if you want 
rewind?

I've never really been a fan of these methods that are optionally implemented 
... and you must know the type if you know it can rewind.

So what about making reset required (and work the same across all TokenStreams) 
and adding rewind to CachingTokenFilter then?

> implement reusableTokenStream for all contrib analyzers
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1794
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib/analyzers
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Assignee: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1794.patch, LUCENE-1794.patch, LUCENE-1794.patch
>
>
> most contrib analyzers do not have an impl for reusableTokenStream
> regardless of how expensive the back compat reflection is for indexing speed, 
> I think we should do this to mitigate any performance costs. hey, overall it 
> might even be an improvement!
> the back compat code for non-final analyzers is already in place so this is 
> easy money in my opinion.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to