[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746926#action_12746926
 ] 

Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1849:
---------------------------------------

How about making acceptsDocsOutOfOrder()  no abstract and provide a default 
implementation that just returns a field that can only be set by a protected 
method? E.g. protected setAcceptsDocsOutOfOrder()  can be initialized by a 
ctor? Or make the field private and initialize it by a ctor in the abstract 
calss? By that cou can create a subclass of Collector like the following:
{code}
Collector c = new Collector(true/false) {
  public void collect(...)...
  ...
}
{code}
I would like this, as it is much simplier to use instead of always implementing 
this silly one-liner.

> Add OutOfOrderCollector and InOrderCollector subclasses of Collector
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1849
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1849
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: Tim Smith
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> I find myself always having to implement these methods, and i always return a 
> constant (depending on if the collector can handle out of order hits)
> would be nice for these two convenience abstract classes to exist that 
> implemented acceptsDocsOutOfOrder() as final and returned the appropriate 
> value

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to