On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 08:51:29PM -0500, Chris Abbey wrote: > > >A # indicates that the run failed validity checks. > > poor bor...er...inprise.... You can use Borland :). Anyway, the result is not bad since the JIT has been released as a public Beta test and we'd like to know more details about icomaptibilities or bugs. After all that's the purpose of beta testing :) -- Paolo Ciccone JBuilder dev. team. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Benchmark results for Linux JVM... Nelson Minar
- Re: Benchmark results for Linux JVM... Andreas Rueckert
- Re: Benchmark results for Linux... Matt Welsh
- Re: Benchmark results for Linux JVM... Todd Papaioannou
- Re: Benchmark results for Linux... Chris Abbey
- Re: Benchmark results for Linux... Godmar Back
- Linux JVMs Ian Corner
- Re: Linux JVMs Godmar Back
- Re: Linux JVMs Chris Abbey
- Re: Linux JVMs Nathan Meyers
- Re: Benchmark results for Linux JVMs (formatted for ... Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Benchmark results for Linux JVMs (formatted for 70 co... Martin Schröder
- Re: Benchmark results for Linux JVMs (formatted for 70 co... Renzo Pecoraro