does anyone know why I can't access any alphaworks.ibm.com webpage with
netscape 4.6 from my linux box?? netscape always stalls after after a
few bytes...

thanks!
renzo



Raja Vallee-Rai wrote:
> 
> I goofed with the last message and messed up the formatting.
> Here's a better version:
> 
> -Raja
> 
> -----------------------------
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We have formally evaluated the different virtual machines available
> for Linux and thought it would be worthwhile to share the results with
> the Linux community.
> 
> The following tests were conducted on an unloaded dual processor
> Pentium II/400mhz running Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.2.8).  Each
> benchmark execution was repeated ten times.  We discarded the maximum
> and minimum results, and averaged the remaining 8 execution times.
> 
> The first 9 benchmarks come from the specJVM98 benchmark suite
> (http://www.spec.org), and the last two benchmarks come from our own
> private collection.
> 
> base(s): time in seconds to run under blackdown jdk 1.2, pre-release
> 2, with jit.
> 
> sunint: speedup (base time/this time) of the blackdown jdk1.2,
> pre-release 2, with no jit.
> 
> borjit: speedup of blackdown jdk1.2, pre-release 2, with the Borland
> jit installed (http://www.borland.com)
> 
> ibmjit: speedup of the AlphaWorks IBM 1.1.8 JIT
> (http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com)
> 
> A # indicates that the run failed validity checks.
> 
>            base(s)    sunint    borjit    ibmjit
>      check     .84 -    1.33 -    1.25 #    1.75 -
>   compress   65.61 -     .15 -    1.07 -    2.42 -
>         db  148.43 -     .57 -     .98 -    2.98 -
>       jack   64.50 -     .43 -    1.35 -    3.65 -
>      javac   75.67 -     .54 -    1.21 -    2.51 -
>       jess   50.86 -     .47 -    1.44 -    2.67 -
>  mpegaudio   54.61 -     .15 -    1.19 #    2.32 -
>       mtrt   40.32 -     .41 -    1.78 -    2.79 -
>   raytrace   55.56 -     .45 -    1.92 -    3.04 -
>  sablecc-w   42.57 -     .58 -    1.06 -    2.32 -
>     soot-j  132.93 -     .69 -    1.25 -    2.26 -
> 
> The conclusions are fairly obvious.  Now, if only IBM had a jit for
> 1.2...  We also evaluated shujit and tyajit, but they were unable to
> run most of the benchmarks correctly. Stay tuned for a comparison of
> NT Java Virtual Machines in the near future, on the same hardware.
> 
> Permission is granted to re-distribute this e-mail in any medium as
> long as it remains unchanged.  All trademarks belong to their
> respective owners.
> 
> To everyone working on Java for Linux: keep up the great work! :)
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Raja Vallee-Rai ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Sable Research Group
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to