On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 02:34:27PM -0800, Nathan Meyers wrote: > Java is a memory hog... it's not JBuilder, it's Java. I've found that > my system was pretty much useless for any Java work at 64M. When Linux > JDKs catch up with some of the improvements now being enjoyed in other > environments (like HotSpot), the situation should improve. Actually the memory footprint for JBuilder is pretty much the same on Windows. JDK 1.2 is bigger than 1.1, it provides more services too, and that's quite consistent across platforms. It is true that the Windows version is more optimized and Hotspot make a difference, especially for big applications. All this has been promised to change with JDK 1.3. -- Paolo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Vincent Trussart
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Alan Hazelton
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Brian Pomerantz
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Syam_Kumar_Abburi
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nicholas Wright
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise kornel c
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise kornel c
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise noisebrain
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise kornel c
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers